[ad_1]
Californians strongly believe that they are the guardians of gambling in the nation’s largest state, and people across the state are embracing that sentiment. Strip away the technology, the bad media, and all the other noise, and it turns out that the old values are, in fact, still true in the modern world.
On Tuesday night, California voters made it clear that they stood behind their people, defeating two sports betting initiatives and giving the people what they wanted: a chance to identify and plan ideas for their next steps.
As of 4:00 a.m. PT Wednesday, with 41% of precincts reporting, Fox5 San Diego reported that 83.4% of voters opposed Proposition 27 (the state’s phone bill is supported by commercial managers) with 16.6% support. At the same time, 70.5% of voters opposed Proposition 26 (a publicly-backed commercial bet) and 29.5% supported it.
The results mean Californians will be shut out of sports betting until the next election cycle, if not longer, while surrounded by legal gambling states. For commercial investors, this means that the three largest states by population will remain neutral. The project that failed in California was the second such loss this year, after the administration withdrew a proposal in Florida when it was clear that it would not meet the deadline to collect signatures.
Big spenders, nothing to show for it
After more than $400 million was spent by supporters and opponents of legalizing digital gambling in California, the net result was nothing. Gambling in the Golden State is the same today as it was yesterday. Public casinos continue to offer Las Vegas-style gambling, horse racing leagues continue to pay parimutuel, and card rooms offer small table games. No illegal sports betting, no wheeling, no gambling, no new way for people to judge card rooms.
And people like that.
“The repeal of Proposition 27 means California continues to allow tribes to offer safe, legal, and fully regulated gambling,” said Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Tribal Chairman Reid Milanovich. Game Handle Tuesday. “Thank you to the voters of California for supporting public health, and continuing to support what they have supported for the past 20-30 years.”
Of the two projects on the ballot, the 27th Award went down the hardest, although that’s not a surprise to those in the industry. Backed by a consortium that includes Bally’s, BetMGM, DraftKings, Fanatics, FanDuel, PENN Entertainment/Barstool Sportsbook, and WynnBET, Proposition 27 allows for nationwide mobile gaming and platforms tied to the folk sports hall.
Four weeks before the election, DraftKings CEO Jason Robins and FanDuel CEO Amy Howe raised a white flag at a gaming conference in Las Vegas, saying they would “come back and fight a other days.” Since then, there have been few “Yes on 27” announcements, commercial enterprises have already begun to think about how to move forward in the government and find ways to work with the people.
“Our coalition knew that passing Prop 27 would be an uphill battle, and we will remain committed to California,” supporters of Proposition 27 said in an emailed statement Tuesday night. “This initiative has strengthened our resolve to see California follow more than half the state in legalizing safe and responsible online sports betting.
“Californians are spending billions each year on illegal rural sports betting websites – unsafe and illegal enterprises that offer protections for minors and consumers and no support for programs. state priority. Californians deserve the benefits of a safe, responsible, accountable, and tax-efficient online sports betting market, and we’re determined to bring it here.”
People are still looking for the right way to enforce the law
Proposition 26, which was supported by the tribes, was also about to fail — but tribal peace survived. The project legalized private gambling at public casinos and four horse racetracks, added craps and wheels to public casinos, and allowed citizens to sue card rooms. .
The project was the first to be put on the ballot, and the project was supposed to be in the 2020 election, but due to the COVID-19 ban, that dream was destroyed, and in 2022, the proposal seemed premature, and the people would be better off using their time, energy, and bankroll trying to defeat the commercial managers they believe are trying to usurp their power instead of handing it over to them. own agenda. According to a public statement, his campaign No on 27 did not spend a single penny to seek the ratification of the Campaign 26.
Tribal leaders across California rejoiced Tuesday night in what they considered a major victory: the defeat of Proposition 27.
“Corporate executives thought they could go to California, throw their money, fool the voters, and get a victory. It’s a big mistake,” said Beth Glasco, vice chairman of the Barona Band. of Mission Indians, in a statement. “Voters are smart. They saw false promises in Amendment 27. Corporations misled the voters of California and the decisions of our people.”
Dan Little, chief government affairs officer for the San Manuel Association of Missionary Indians, called Proposition 27 “an attack by outside corporations,” adding, “Those corporations need to know that Californians continue to protect their people and sovereignty, and work with Californians to improve our health, now and in the future.
“”We will continue to fight as if this is our last fight,” Victor Rocha, a member of the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and owner of https://t.co/KMaws4naje, said at G2E . “They don’t do it. respect the independence of the iwi, they do not care about the iwi.” https://t.co/tVuuUbZK3e
— Victor Rocha (@VictorRocha1) November 9, 2022
Confederate Indians of Graton Rancheria Tribal Chairman Greg Sarris, whose tribe put $30 million into the No on 27 campaign and supported the Yes on 26 campaign, fears that commercial investors will allow phone bills set an example that he believes will harm public finances. health, making it easy for young children to access digital gaming, and giving back to the government.
“I know what this means to my people, I know the sacrifices we’ve made, I know what we’ve done for the communities,” Sarris said. Game Handle, pointing to the $200 million his people have poured into education, funding for police and fire departments, and other community improvements. “Don’t think for a second that we will let you go [anyone take that away from us].” Sarris also said that since his tribe opened its casino nine years ago, the high school dropout rate on the reservation has dropped from 80% to 100%.
The future is uncertain
While the election results may seem like all players are back at square one, that may not be the case. The depth and breadth of negative media created a new dimension and deepened the previous ones. These situations make it harder for nations and regulators to find a middle ground. Commercial sources say they will continue to find ways to work with their fellow tribesmen, as tribes say they will come together to decide what they believe. best of all, they are in no rush to change habits. position
A vote to legalize online sports betting in California looks set to collapse and crumble under the weight of voter apathy toward sports betting and a flood of state-sponsored opposition ads. Native people of the state.https://t.co/ AZO1tYFsJA
— KQED Arts & Culture (@KQEDarts) November 9, 2022
“It’s important that we all talk together,” Sarris said of the people of California. “We have to go back to our old thinking, the thinking before the context, to thinking ‘we’ because we can’t be between ourselves and thinking ‘us’, to ‘they’ let greed get in the way.”
Legislative funding requires legislative change, so whether citizens, commercial regulators, or the state legislature — or some combination of the three — decide on a plan, the bottom line is the voters. the right of the last word. The opportunity for an election campaign or referendum is the 2024 presidential election.
[ad_2]
Source link
